Another solution would be to keep the discussions on topic and open up a
separate mailing list for people interested in open discussions.
Jonathan
At 07:17 PM 9/26/2004 +0100, you wrote:
I was somewhat concerned reading Mark's posting earlier today.
Obviously, things are very bad in the US at the moment. Their Government
even deported Cat Stevens the other day (check
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3686992.stm ).
Clearly, given the fact that Digium contributes so much to Asterisk, they
shouldn't be forced to risk their company's future by hosting these
mailing lists in such an unstable environment where they could get sued
for any ridiculous reason. Even an unjustified, ambit claim could
generate huge defence costs on Digium's part, and cripple their ability to
contribute to Asterisk.
Therefore, it seems to be in the best interests of Asterisk's `security'
to have the mailing lists hosted by someone other than Digium and maybe in
a country that doesn't prohibit freedom of expression.
I would certainly be willing to organise hosting through another company
that wouldn't be at risk from vexatious legal claims. This would allow
genuinely open discussion on the lists and would mean that no messages
would need to be censored from the archives.
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
