Brian Capouch wrote:
Of course, the problem of the hard-coded "priority + 101" situation is problematical. I say we think through what the perfect world would look like in this respect and then see how hard it would be to implement. . .

XML will probably able to store much, probably more, of the flat text in a marked up as 'Asterisk XML', created with a nice XSL-template there would even for +101 situations not be any problems.


But my major consern is the validness of goto statements, but thats probably also the issue with the current 'list' versions.

It is allready possible to start developing an 'Asterisk XML' since with an XSLT preprocessor you are able to generate a valid extension.conf.



Stefan de Konink
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to