[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, David McNett wrote: > >> On 14-Oct-2004, Stephen R. Besch wrote: >> No, it is a violation of the EULA on RedHat's server products to run >> them without having purchased a support agreement. It is not >> permitted to obtain or run RedHat Enterprise Linux without having >> paid for it. >> >> I'm not sure how they get away with this practice on GPL'd code, but >> they do. > > Parts of the distribution is non-gpl. This is a "mere > aggregation" which > is allowed. Also, you are not allowed to use their trademarks > for your own > distribution. > > There are several distributions which are based on the > packages from RH ES > 3, with the proprietary packages removed. These are all in the clear. > > Peter > >
CentOS: http://www.centos.org/ White Box: http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/ TaoLinux: http://taolinux.org/ Are free distros based on the RHEL versions. Have a great day! Geoff _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
