Brian West wrote: >> The EULA is where the real teeth are -- prohibiting even people who >> have purchased RHEL from using it in ways that RedHat prohibits. For >> example, it is not possible to purchase one copy of RHEL and install >> it on two machines. Nor are you allowed to run RHEL on a machine >> without having purchased support. I am unclear on how this is not a >> further restriction on the code (and therefore prohibited by the >> GPL) but the FSF appears unwilling to pursue the point. > > I do feel that those are violations of the GPL. They can't place more > restrictions on software that is already free via the GPL. This is > the exact reason I told RedHat to f$%k off. They used the community > to build a brand then said F$%K YOU, but here is Fedora which we will > use to test new stuff that might make it into RedHat's high end > products. So basically you're a test community for future RedHat > products if you run Fedora. >
Not to aruge one way or the other, but there are a number of free RH Enterprise work-alike distributions http://www.taolinux.org/ http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/ etc. Jim James H. Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users