Michael, I usually read and don't do much posting, but I had to on this.
I am really suprised to see your commnets, and wondered what is the basis ? We have had a dual Xenon with a quad port T1 card in production for 16 months processing as many as 20,000 messaging calls a day. The box has never crashed, the board has never crashed, we haven't even restarted asterisk much less upgraded the code. I have never take a Bit Error on my DMS-500 from a Digium card. This is only one of several "production boxes" but the story is the same on all of them. How in the heck does this equate to: "hardware, drivers, or both is pretty sketchy" ? I would suggest just the opposite. Mark and the boys have done a great job on all fronts. How many Cisco AS-5300's have that record ? I have 9 of them brand new and not a single one is my answer. If you haven't looked at Digium lately, look again. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Loftis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 2:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Alternatives to the T100Ps? Since I'm pretty sure that either the hardware, drivers, or both is pretty sketchy I'm interested in hearing alternatives, non-digium, and non-zaptel kernel modules, for ISDN PRI with *. -- GPG/PGP --> 0xE736BD7E 5144 6A2D 977A 6651 DFBE 1462 E351 88B9 E736 BD7E _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
