How about a school strapped for cash, with around 60 POTS phones on
hand and an almost free source of another 60? Versus a cost (here in
Austria) of $99 for the cheapest VoIP phone (the cheapest Grandstream
model). Of course that also means that FXS is only of interest if
I can get it for under around $50-60/port -- if things cost more it
becomes easier to argue early replacement of these POTS phones by IP phones.


Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes,


I don't really understand the obsession with FXS devices.

The only uses I see for FXS are

- connect a FAX machine, where FAX may not be the best application for
VoIP anyway,
- connect an existing cordless phone, where you probably have only one
such device and a Grandstream HT286 will just do fine,
- connect the analog phone in a hotel to a travel adapter, IAXy would
seem to be the best choice here because you are so much more likely to
encounter NAT traversal problems and other obstacles that you may not
be able to resolve with a SIP device,
- feed some Internet based phone services into a legacy PBX that wants
to see them as CO lines, here again, depending on the number of feeds,
HT286 may be cheap and cheerful enough.

For anything else IP phones should be the default with no buts and no
ifs. I am always puzzled by how people desperately hang on to legacy
stuff they don't really need and in the process create a beast of a
kludge technology. The x86 architecture (or lack thereof) should be an
example that serves to show how not to design your stuff with legacy
support as your all-overriding number one priority. So, let's not make
the same mistake with VoIP. Let's get rid of analog phones as fast and
forcefully as we possibly can.

In other words, FXS should be the very very last resort when there is
really no other way.


_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to