The chart is good, but I think it makes a mistake for iLBC:
Isn't iLBC 13.something kbps?
Also, since iLBC uses 30ms frames (when used with asterisk, at least), it has slightly lower overhead. Approx 2/3 as much overhead.
(not that I'm a big iLBC fanboy or anything.. -- I still prefer a free codec).
-SteveK
On Oct 30, 2004, at 6:08 PM, Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
I thought this might be of interest to the list.
http://www.convergence.com.pk/iax2/trunked.html
Wasim, you should tell us about those things here. Anyway, keep up the good work ;-)
rgds benjk
-- Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan.
NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists may get trashed. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
