>-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- >[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Garrett Smith >Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:13 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial >Discussion' >Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Wireless VOIP Phone suggestions > >The Sipura SPA-2000 is a great alternative to the Cisco unit, and is also >$60.00 cheaper. > >Garrett >
Right you are. Cisco can be expensive. Also I did not answer the question he asked. I have one 900Mhz and one 2.4Ghz cordless. The 2.4 can cause WIFI interference if used to close to our network access point. I think 900Mhz units are becoming dinosaurs. But, correct me if I am wrong, the lower frequency travels farther than 2.4? I know this is true with the old 900mhz versus 2.4Ghz access points. We had a site survey for both and had to install more 2.4Ghz access points to cover that same area as covered with fewer of the old 900MHz units. --john _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
