Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: loss concealment (Steve Kann)

[Steve Kann]

Public Dump wrote: Thank you for the URL. To clarify the information from the page, IF I would use iLBC I would enjoy loss concealment ? When/If this proposed jitterbuffer is implemented, then if you would be able to enjoy PLC (Packet loss concealment) with your choice of several codecs, including at least G711, PCM, Speex and iLBC.  The first two with a simple concealment algorithm (I think one is described in an RFC), and the latter via their built-in interpolation algorithms. -SteveK Message: 1 Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 10:30:41 -0500 From: Steve Kann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] loss concealment To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Public Dump wrote: Is asterisk capable of sealing (some amount) of losses that occur on IP based channels before it routes the Calls to a TDM channel (BRI, E1, etc.) to limit quality loss if IP loss occurs ? No, not yet. See http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20new%20jitterbuff er -SteveK _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users