Citat Joe Greco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > [snip] > > > > >If someone believes that they are contributing software to a GPL'd > > >software project, and does not realize that the nature of your > disclaimer > > >allows Digium to release their changes under a non-GPL'd license, then > > >that is breaking with the spirit of the GPL. > > > > If that is true, then the GPL is not comprehensive enough to cover its own > > > "spirit", so what you are saying is that the GPL implementation is > > fundamentally flawed. > > The GPL is fundamentally flawed in that it's never been functionally tested > and challenged in court, and many IP lawyers believe that there are > challenges that it would not survive. The fact that some lawyers may have > found further legal loopholes to exploit is not shocking, given the holes > in the current implementation.
It has been tested in city/county court in Munich (Germany) and found valid (http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/07/23/1558219&tid=117), not that that might help anybody in the US, but it is a start. Kind regards, Martin List-Petersen _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
