On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 08:30, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > >>Further, that really does seem to fly in the face of the spirit of the GPL, > >>and this is touched on by the GPL FAQ: > >> > >>http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCReleaseUnderGPLAndNF > >> > >>http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCDeveloperViolate > > > You may or may not be aware that to contribute code to FSF owned and > maintained software one needs to assign copyright to the FSF in much the > same way one is required to assign copyrights to Digium. > > True, I don't think the FSF are going to sell licenses to those programs > under different terms and Digium does.
Could you please go and read Marks (or my) mail again ? I don't know about the FSF (haven't checked) but with Digium you are keeping your copyright, but giving Digium a non-excluse, non-revocable license to your changes. Kind regards, Martin List-Petersen _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
