I take it that you are talking about the commented out ";emailbody=" line? I guess that could be. I just figured that since it was:
"message CIDName , CIDNum message" and it went to: "message CIDName , message" that a variable was "accidentally" left out somewhere where it used to be. But, now that I think about it, I can see an argument where you wouldn't want, for privacy reasons, someones phone number going out over email. They would just change the default value of "emailbody=" to where the variable was left out, instead of just forgetting assign it a value. Looking at the sample configs for the new version, "emailbody=" and the variables that you can assign it are the same. Looking at app_voicemail.c there is a line that says: pbx_builtin_setvar_helper(ast, "VM_CALLERID", (callerid ? callerid : "an unknown caller")); The "pbx_builtin_setvar_helper" function, as well as how it's called in app_voicemail.c, is the same in my old and new versions. I can't find exactly where the CDRs are written, but one would assume that it uses a similar function to get CIDName and CIDNum. --jason On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 10:28 -0500, Steve Prior wrote: > I noticed that the commented out mail message in voicemail.conf isn't actually > what is the default. I fell into the trap that because it was there as a > sample > and commented out that I assumed it was actually the default and it's close, > but not exactly. Maybe the default behavior actually changed and should be > changed > back, but actually putting it in your voicemail.conf from the sample file is > the fix. > > Hope this helps > Steve Prior > > Jason Peck wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I recently updated * to 1.0.x from a CVS version downloaded in July, at > > the request of BroadVoice. Every since the upgrade, the email > > notifications that a voicemail has been left only contains CIDName and > > not CIDNum. Here's an example: > .... > > > I've installed 1.0.0, 1.0.2, and the latest CVS, and they all seem to be > > having this problem. I've searched through a couple months of the > > mailing list, and briefly in the bugdb, but I haven't been able to find > > anyone else that seems to be having this problem as well. Has anyone > > seen this before? Is it a known bug? Might I have something > > misconfigured? > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
