No I totally agree with you, you get revenue by selling installations into corporates who need rock solid backup and support.
I think they've got a great product and a bright future. Cheers, Dean -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin Anderson Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:50 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk gui? > Just wondering how difficult it would be for AMP devs to develop a > install wizard or a batch file that can automatically execute the > install and download necessary dependencies... until then, I guess > I'll be continuing to manually config my asteisk files.... IMO the brutal part was resolving the dependencies. Once that was done, just follow all the instructions on the guide (even the old one) and you shouldn't have problems, even for a noob. I suck at Linux admin and I got it to go just fine. You have to give Coalescent a break on this, there's no business model in it for them to make good docs or an install script to make AMP work perfect every time. They have a payroll to make, and a $220 bounty probably isn't going to cut it for them. This, on Slashdot yesterday, was interesting and worth a look: http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/23/1835258&tid=190&tid=18 5&ti d=106 The Holy Grail of a unified (truly - unified) package manager?? _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
