On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 10:17 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: > I _think_ I read it correctly the first time. Isn't the original question > oriented around call control as opposed to 'disconnect supervision'? > > Disconnect supervision _is_ the signaling that a call has terminated (via > zero voltage on tip/ring), and the majority of US telco switch vendors > implement that as a default. "Who" gets to originate the disconnect is > the issue, right? Or, do I need more coffee? :)
When you go all the way back to the original question, it was about the signalling from asterisk via an FXS port to a phone via a TDM400 card. So maybe some more coffee might be a good idea, but a threaded mail reader that lets you quickly check back up the thread is better. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
