On Tuesday 16 November 2004 17:12, Jay Milk wrote: > I'm a fairly reasonable person, and I have yet to see one good argument > (and quoting netiquette is not on argument, that's opinion) for > bottom-posting. To me, it is terribly inefficient and wastes time, > especially when you hide your post between the original message and some > ludicrously elaborate signature. Top-posting, to me, is more logical, > as it presents the answer in a prominent position. And inline-posting > makes sense when you're responding to multiple questions or points in an > email... >
Whether you top post or not is irrelevant really. Top posting - you have to scroll around to find out what question they are answering. bottom posting - you have to scroll to find the answer. I'll reply to both top and bottom postings - if I think I've got anything to add. What's more annoying is people who just click reply instead of starting a new tread. Jon _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
