On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Brian West wrote: > I don't agree with this patch yet... It's the distro's fault for doing this > wrong and I don't feel we have to work around it. The few people I talked > to have Symlinks the "build" to /usr/src/linux or the like. Then again I > may be wrong anyone know what is the right(tm) thing to do here is?
Havn't 2.6 adopted the /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/ convention or something similar? Not having any 2.6-based machines online at the moment I can not check. This is from memory compiling out-of-tree modules a while back. Peter _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
