Kevin Walsh wrote:
Robert Rozman [EMAIL PROTECTED] lazily top-posted:Would that be the same UK as the one that came up with this: http://www.*patent*.gov.*uk*/*patent*/ legal/decisions/2004/o29204.pdf ?
do you have info in what countries g.729 is not valid... ?
You could start with the whole of Europe and can also add the UK. I'm sure there are lots of other countries who don't feel the need to acknowledge US-based software and algorithm patents too.
This subject has been covered several zillion times in the mail list. Google is your friend.
The worrying thing about that is within the arbitrators terms of reference the decision is right. This is a patentable thing under the 1977 UK patent law. However, prior art goes back to the earliest computers in the 1940s. The decision doesn't seem to allow for that.
Regards, Steve _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
