> Colin Anderson wrote: > > < Cause (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: > > User (0) > > < Ext: 1 Cause: Info. element nonexist or not implemented > > (99), class = > > > > Looks like the switch on the telco end might be confused about the number > > pattern; try adding: > > > > pridialplan=unknown > > > > to zapata.conf in your channel definition, this can cause the switch to do a > > brute force match of the number pattern. > > > > Also try dialing local first, if that works then it is definitely because > > the telco is not liking what Asterisk is presenting to it for a number > > pattern. > > I don't really understand why do many people set their pridialplan. The > text "PRI Dialplan: Only RARELY used for PRI." in zapata.conf.sample is > not there to just take up space in the file.
For this specific US implementation, the pridialplan= isn't needed. I did try setting it to local, national, etc, and local always failed. The other choices worked fine for the local number that I was dialing. My original problem turned out to be the telco is blocking all calls that are not local (and I was originally trying to dial a non-local number). Since this is the first pri I've turned up with *, I don't have a clue what I'm talking about. Can only experiment and follow other's leads. Thanks everyone for the assist. Rich _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
