I would seriously doubt that you can actually squeeze 12 channels throughIt would be wiser to know that it has a good chance of working rather than "let's do it anyway" :-) I was wondering if anybody on the list has similar experience with lots of channels / little bandwith / IAX trunking.
that dsl and obtain anything reasonable for quality, regardless of which
asterisk codec you choose. But, it certainly would not be that hard to
test it and validate assumptions.
If that dsl is used for anything else (including hackers/scanners hittingOf course if somebody starts to flood the pipe with bogus traffic, sound will be garbage... but then again it could be true with any kind of public internet connection. It's just that bigger pipes are harder to flood :-/
the IP associated with the circuit), quality will vary. Don't forget to
add the IP packet overhead to the codec bandwidth estimates.
For the IP/UDP overhead, isn't it something IAX2 trunking is supposed to be good for?
Cheers, Jean-Michel.
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
