On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:11:06 -0600, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: >Paul Fielding wrote: >> Hmmm.... I could certainly see that being the issue. If it is the >> issue, though, then I think it's something that needs to be addressed. >> >> In my opinion, Digium needs to address it, as well as the whole >> provisioning via cli thing. I know Asterisk itself is a CLI oriented >> piece of software, but the more one can do do decrease configuration >> timing and issues the better off one is. I think it would be a benefit >> to allow the IAXy to be programmed via web interface. >> >> For that matter, from what I can tell via my own experimentation, it >> appears that you cannot use DNS to define the asterisk server to it. >> This is bad, since it means that if the IP of the asterisk server >> changes, you need to directly reprovision *all* of your IAXy devices.... >> >> For a new product, it has potential, hopefully these things will be >> addressed.... > >The IAXy does not have the CPU, RAM, or Flash to be able to add any >significant features. I think it has 4k or RAM and 4k of Flash.
I wonder if a slightly different approach to provision of the IAXy could be taken,.... (prob still not enough ram/flash..... a bootp type protocol to a dns, with not only code, but dialplan (based on MAC address) as well, maybe just extra ram ? I haven't looked but it might be only a few chip change..... . _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
