> What's wrong with doing it by port? We're actually using SIP to terminate calls, going by rtp.conf the ports could range several thousand ports. What we're going for is only honoring TOS for that particular customer, luckily these are T1 customers hosted on our routers. They understand that their firewalls cannot pass TOS, if they do (ie: we packet sniff and see this) then they're on their own.
In a nutshell we wanted to avoid using hardcoded ports, what if say a game server was in that port range (and used udp lol), you would be rather screwed. >same TOS flags as Asterisk, by prioritizing port 4569 (IAX2 protocol) you know for sure that the >only packets in that queue are VoIP traffic. Also, what about your incoming traffic? Are the TOS >flags correct there? I'm not saying that TOS is bad, just that as you've seen, it can get changed >along the way. I'm using port number to separate traffic and it is working great. > >-Ron _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
