On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:35:16PM -0500, Leif Madsen said: > On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:32:24 +0200, Shoval Tomer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can anyone comment why shouldn't we use FC 3 for an * production system? > > > > I'm not looking to start a distro war, but we just found out that redhat > > 9 (and FC 1) don't support SATA drives, and apparently FC 3 does. > > > > We are only familiar with red hat and are in a point in time that > > switching distros is not available. > > The guy installing the system is already on location. > > > > Yes, I know we made a silly mistake. Please help us... > > Thanks. > > I'm not too sure what you want help with. You say that you are stuck > to using FC3 because earlier versions don't support SATA drives? > Could you use an older version and recompile the SATA drive support > into the kernel? What about FC2 as it's 2.6 kernel based?
Another option is installing a good SATA controller like the 3ware. Drives show up as SCSI, and even fairly old distro's work out of the box with them. Most onboard controllers are pretty crappy - avoid Promise and their fake RAID. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
