The zaptel 1.0.3 source fails to compile just as you have described. (I have been trying to debug it for an RPM I build).
Use the CVS version - it works on 2.6.9 with FC3 so I imagine it should work with 2.6.10? Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Cotton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk List" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 5:08 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 compile with new 2.6.10 fails > On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 21:14 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > > All, > > > > I have FC3 fedora core 3 and just installed and compiled 2.6.10. > > after rebooting I attempted to recompile zaptel-1.0.3. I did a make clean > > then make. I got the following errors. > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > ------------------------------- > > > > /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/torisa.c:1139: warning: 'set_tor_base' > > defined but not used > > CC [M] /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/wcusb.o > > CC [M] /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/wcfxo.o > > CC [M] /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/wcfxs.o > > /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/wcfxs.c: In function `wcfxs_interrupt': > > /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/wcfxs.c:473: sorry, unimplemented: inlining > > failed in call to 'wcfxs_proslic_check_hook': function body not available > > /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/wcfxs.c:810: sorry, unimplemented: called > > from here > > /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/wcfxs.c:474: sorry, unimplemented: inlining > > failed in call to 'wcfxs_proslic_recheck_sanity': function body not > > available > > /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/wcfxs.c:812: sorry, unimplemented: called > > from here > > /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/wcfxs.c:472: sorry, unimplemented: inlining > > failed in call to 'wcfxs_voicedaa_check_hook': function body not available > > /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/wcfxs.c:814: sorry, unimplemented: called > > from here > > make[2]: *** [/usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3/wcfxs.o] Error 1 > > make[1]: *** [_module_/usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.0.3] Error 2 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.10' > > make: *** [linux26] Error 2 > > What version of gcc? To overcome this with other programs I had to > install an older version of gcc and then configure to use that for those > compiles. > > > > > -- > Dave Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
