So "o" is broken in the latest stable? And I have to apply this patch? The notes didn't seem clear whether this patch was included or not in the latest stable. I'm about to upgrade but need to know if I should apply this patch.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of B. J. Bomar Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 9:05 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] "o" extension broken? That was it. Thanks for the help. B. J. -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Boehm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 18:03 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] "o" extension broken? check to see if you have "operator=yes" defined for each voicemail user. see patch: http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0003080 -matthew ----- Original Message ----- From: "B. J. Bomar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 5:39 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] "o" extension broken? > It is defined, and was working on a previous version of Asterisk. I'm not > sure when it stopped working. > > B. J. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Boehm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 16:55 > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] "o" extension broken? > > you need to define the "o" extension to do whatever you want it to do. > > -Matthew > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "B. J. Bomar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:45 PM > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] "o" extension broken? > > > > Hello all. I just found out that I am no longer able to exit out of > > voicemail properly by hitting the 0 key, but the * key works. Asterisk > > comes back and says "I'm sorry, I did not understand that response" and > goes > > on in the context. Is this a new "feature" or bug? Is anyone else having > > this problem? I am using Asterisk 1.0.3, and have tried it on two > separate > > machines. > > > > Thanks, > > > > B. J. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
