When you say CVS HEAD is the the same as stable? where do you get it from and what params do you use?
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:03:34 +0000, Niksa Baldun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is no easy answer to your question. If you ask me, I prefer not to use > any patches, except that I am forced to use bristuff because I have quadBRI > ISDN cards. Bristuff patches Zaptel in order to enable using quadBRI and > octoBRI cards, and also adds some features to *. More info on > www.junghanns.net. > > Like you said, really valuable patches will make it to the CVS sooner or > later, so I prefer to wait because it makes installation and maintenance > easier. > > I use Gentoo with 2.6 kernel. I am not sure whether you will get any > benefits from upgrading, but I didn't have any problems with it (except that > I had to migrate from devfs to udev, but that issue exists with 2.4 kernel > too). > > > Paul Rodan wrote: > > > Ok, > > > > I usually use the latest stable CVS, with no patches or modifications. If > figured if there was a worthwhile patch, Mark would have already included > it. However, there was that neat patch about being able to press a certain > key and it'd begin recording in mid-stream, that was an awesome feature and > I patched my latest features.c file with that patch. But I keep seeing > mentions of other patches, specifically something about the MOH patch, the > BRISTUFFED patch, and now I'm hearing about a "Super Parking Lot" patch? For > now I've been using the mpg123 method, it tends to work for me, but if I can > save CPU/RAM and other troubles by using another format, which one do I go > with? What is BRISTUFFED? And if I'm right, the super parking lot patch > allows for call parking based on context, a way to break it apart, instead > of making it universal across the whole system (where can I find this > patch)? > > > > So I'm going to ask the question, if I were to install the latest CVS Stable > tonight, which patches should I install on it before compiling? Also, I'm > using Gentoo Linux, with the 2.4.26-r9 gentoo kernel. I've seen issues with > people making Asterisk work perfectly with the 2.6 kernel so I've stayed > clear of it, but I still see people fighting to make it work and such, I saw > one post a while back about the benefits using Asterisk w/ the 2.6 kernel, > can somebody please refresh my memory? What are the benefits of using > Asterisk with the 2.6 kernel? I'm trying to get the most out of my system. > > > > Any help in making tonights compile/upgrade go perfect would be greatly > appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > Paul________________________________ > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing > list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To > UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
