On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 21:09 -0500, C F wrote: > The definition of normal in the case of PBX implementations is up to > the customer.
You sure are acting like a 'tard lately. No a customer does not define normal, the market defines normal. A customer defines an implementation. That implementation is either normal or an exception/deviation of normal. > On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:44:51 -0600, Steven Critchfield > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 16:08 +0000, Patrick Lidstone (Personal e-mail) > > wrote: > > > > > I don't think Kelly's response is correct, at least for TDM FXO boards. > > > I could not find a way of preventing the FXO board grabbing the line > > > when it rang, and subsequent enquiries on this list at the time > > > suggested that it wasn't actually possible - which is a pity, as it > > > means it is impossible to piggy back Asterisk on a POTS line with other > > > auto-answering equipment (e.g. data collection terminals). > > > > It isn't normal to put a PBX on a line shared with other equipment. It > > is normal to route the other equipment through the PBX. > > > > -- > > Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
