On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Tobias J�nsson wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Peter Svensson wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Tobias J�nsson wrote: > >> No, PRI_CAUSE works great at least in 1.0.2, probably in the earlier > >> 1.0 releases too. Busy() may play a busy tone to the caller instead of > >> signalling busy so using PRI_CAUSE is much better in PRI or BRI > >> environment. > > > > The behaviour of Busy() and Congestion() can be changed with the > > "priindication" setting in zapata.conf. The options are "inband" > > (default) or "outofband". This only affects the two applications > > mentioned above. > > Thank you for that information. I have now updated the wiki of > zapata.conf.
Still, like you said, it is better to explicitly set the PRI_CAUSE variable to the desired value. Isdn gives the user the ability to express problems etc in a detailed fashion. Might as wll use it. :) Peter _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
