Why does the X100P have echo and the Wildcard TDM400P have
no echo? I thought the only advantage of using the TDM400P was that
it used less interrupts than the X100P? Are there any other advantages? Cheers, Dean -----Original Message----- >> Want to buy the X100P clones I have? :) > > About the best thing that you can do to reduce Echo on the X101P
and X100P > cards is to; > > 1. Set the following in zapata.conf; > > echocancel=128 > echocancelwhenbridged=no > echotraining=800 > > 2. Enable aggressive echo cancellation in zaptel's zconfig.h file; > > /* > * Uncomment for aggressive residual echo supression under > * MARK2 echo canceller > */ > #define AGGRESSIVE_SUPPRESSOR > > I've had much better luck at killing Echo issues with the above > suggestions, on both my P133 X101P box as well as my TE405P based
PRI > Gateways. It doesn't solve all the issues, but it does help quite > noticeably. Thanks for the tip. However, I have been trying evening after avening
to get the echo out by tweaking the settings. When I received the TDM11 I pulled out the X101P clone followed the example config at the Digium
site and I was up and running without any. I don't mind trying to play
around but wasting a lot of time on really cheap hardware was too much waste
of time when I look back :) It's probably possible to get the echo out but it's not worth it for me
to figure it out :) _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users