For the brave, you can test it out yourself (if you can get the beta to
work without documentation) with the callgenerator on
http://www.astertest.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4
Its far from finished, but it can be used.
zoa.
Steven Critchfield wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 18:51 +0100, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
6b- More than 50 calls VoIP to POTS/T1/E1 will kill an * box due to
excesive transcoding??????
6bb- unless using quad machines, plenty of RAM and DSP cards?????
The max number of calls is something that's not really a hard-and-fast
number. There's been numerous discussions regarding *'s "upper limit"
of connections, check the previous postings to this list for more
info.
Again, it depends on a lot of different variables, like what the * box
is doing, how many AGIs it's running, whether or not you're doing
extensive DB stuff.
Generally speaking, you won't go wrong with a box that's beefy in
terms of RAM.
Exactly what is it that is RAM demanding in Asterisk? A database server
should be separate box anyway....
Asterisk doesn't use very much RAM itself, but any swapping could
destroy call quality. My 2 main asterisk machines that are in production
only have 256 megs and perform just fine. All newer machines are getting
512meg or more but it is mainly because of the cost is negligible to do
the upgrade now.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
