On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 20:15 +0000, Gary Stimson wrote: > On Wednesday 02 February 2005 23:38, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2005, at 0:03, Miguel Ruiz Velasco Sobrino wrote: > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> The DNS approach does not handle single or multiple system failures, > > >> only very elementary load balancing over a lengthy period of time. > > > > > > Are you shure of that? I'm aware that the load criteria is trickier, > > > but very possible. > > > > Operating systems and probably a lot of devices *cache* the results of > > DNS lookups. That means removing A records won't do any good. > > If you give the DJBDNS name server multiple IPs for the same machine, it will > return a set of 8 at random. Won't Windows (and hardphones??) then try those > in order until they succeed? If the address they reach later becomes > unavailable, will the be bright enough to try the other addresses? > > The hard phones must surely expire their DNS cache at some point? > Grandstream phones works fine.
> Gary > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Domjan Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
