On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 07:08:08 +0800, Leo Ann Boon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > See my comments in line
> From my experience, the ATA is a very solid, dependable piece of > hardware. I was told by a source in the company that OEMs for Cisco, the > units are expensive because of the high quality parts being used. The > web config looks crappy but otherwise where else do you find a $100 > device that does SCCP/MGCP/SIP/H323? None of the competitors even come > close to that level of protocol support. For developers who have to work > on various protocols, the ATA is really cool. I agree. I'm using the ATA 186 and think it's great. The latest firmware also changes the web interface - it's similar to the 7905G/7912G phones now. I've also tried the Sipura SPA-2000, but had some problems with it, so the Cisco ATA is my ATA of choice now. -Shaun _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users