Adding in experimental patches willy-nilly, especially ones that have the potential to cause huge problems, confounds attempts to isolate bugs and test functionality.
Mark does a pretty good job of keeping the HEAD version solid enough to use in production, as most of us running it on a daily basis can attest.
What stops you from applying the patches to your own copy, and then playing with it to your heart's content--like the rest of us? It would work just like it had really been put into CVS-HEAD.
less testers less bug reports
for production use is stable version (asterisk doesnt have good roadmap and versioning :( )
My point exactly If we're to see this in 1.2, we need it in CVS ASAP
roy
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
