|
>>It's
more than that, from what I know a *missing*
RTP packet could be >>'silence'
(vad) or it could be 'network related' (jitter). * not seeing >>a packet
doesn't always mean it was vad, it might mean your network had >>a split
second (subsecond) hiccup that caused the packet to disappear - >>both
'look the same' to *. This is why someone had already mentioned >>the idea that the new
jitter-buffer might handle this better/correctly Yes, but you can determine if the packet is missing due to packet loss
or if it is missing due to vad by looking at the RTP sequence numbers and time
stamps. I agree that the first step to getting this properly
working is to get a better jitter buffer as you have to buffer to a degree to
examine the sequence numbers. |
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
