Dare I suggest that a MUCH better job of documenting would go a long way towards eliminating the problems you mention?
Now I realize that programmers are much more interested in writing code than documentation, as well as moving on to the next hot feature than making sure the current set work well, but . . .
I have found the Asterisk handbook Version 2, to be kind, poor, and the Mahler book sold for a small fortune obsolete as well as lacking. Most of what is published in that book is a rehash of what is available on line free for the taking.
Just my opinion, of course.
John Novack
That's exactly it. The Wiki has been the only place that seems to be somewhat consistenly updated with changes in HEAD and STABLE. That's because it can be updated by members of the community. Point people there before you can even get the source or join the list and I think things will be better off for all (hence my post).
-- Kristian Kielhofner _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
