In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kristian Kielhofner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Howard Lowndes wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 08:03, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > > > >>Tony Mountifield wrote: > >> > >>>I've just set up a new box with FC1+updates and the latest Stable > >>>Asterisk from CVS. > >> > >> Why are you using FC1 when FC3 is out? Better yet, why are you using > >>FCx at all? > > > > > > Why not? What are you, some sort of Debian nut? > > I should have known better than to post the second part of my comment.
s/the second part of // HTH > However, getting back to my point, why was the OP using a version of a > distro that had been twice obsoleted with the release of new versions? > He says that he just set it up, and I was wondering if he thought that > it might be better than FC2 or FC3 for some reason. If you must know, not that it's relevant to my question, I was building the box to the same standard as others I have in the field, using a known configuration for minimum risk (i.e. the cost of time when discovering differences) and kernel 2.4. Evaluating FC3 is on my to-do-soon list, and I won't ship it in production boxes until I've had time to try it out with no pressure. OK? Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
