On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:09:09AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > I'd *love* to see the particulars of that test. It's been > > shown time and time > > again that postgres' speed CLOBBERS mysql for anything but > > the simplest > > selects, and that it can handle far more concurrent > > connections without > > slowing down. > > I strongly agree with this, i have a prepaid voip solution with asterisk, > freeradius and postgresql , the hole thing relies in stored procedures and > triggers (i mean the billing, traffic monitoring, admin system, etc). It had > scaled from thousands of minutes per month to two millions in these days > without an issue, we export the cdr to mysql for the IT/Customer Service
OK, as some of you suspected, I found out that the test was serial. I'm having the programmer re-do the testing to be more representative of real-life - many concurent connections doing many different kinds of queries / inserts / updates at the same time. I too prefer postgres, but it's damn hard to state your case when someone hands you test results that show mysql beating the pants off it. I expect that we will see very different results under the new test. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
