Quoting Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Roger Gulbranson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 08:57 -0700, Tom wrote: > > > > > We don't want to have to spend an extra 3 grand for another > > > server just to take up more space when we have this box that is sitting > here > > > idle 99% of the time, and as it has worked spectacularly well with the > wctdm > > > cards, I don't see why it can't with the wcte110p/PRI. > > > > The wctdm only has to transfer data for 4 channels. The wcte110p has to > > do 24 (23+1). Your probability of having problems just went up by a > > factor of 6. > > Also, you may not notice if you miss a ms worth of audio data, but the > digital signalling on a pri will. Ideally this should not be a problem but > with standard kernels it will be. > > Peter >
This is what I have suspected all along is that the signaling and timing constraints on the PRI are such that you basically need asterisk running as a real-time process. The whole point of the thread (in my mind) is if there is anyway to cause X to not run as such a real-time process so as to allow asterisk the proper access to the hardware that it needs? and why can I run X (as in Xvnc which starts x servers) without any problem? but not a real x server? Tom _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
