In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, snacktime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a bit confused about how WaitExten works. I assumed that when it > returns 0, the next priority in the extension would be executed, but > that doesn't seem to be the case. When I get to WaitExten and enter > extension 8, it plays the message, then Waits another 10 seconds and > times out. > > > [local] > exten => s,1,Wait,1 ; Wait a second, just for fun > exten => s,2,Answer ; Answer the line > exten => s,3,DigitTimeout,5 ; Set Digit Timeout to 5 seconds > exten => s,4,BackGround(thank-you-for-calling) ; Play a congratulatory > message > exten => s,5,Playback(enter-ext-of-person) > exten => s,6,WaitExten(10) > exten => s,7,Playback(goodbye) > exten => s,9,Hangup
You have a gap between s,7 and s,9. The Hangup should be on s,8. But that's not relevant to the problem you reported. > exten => 1000,1,Goto(local,s,1) > exten => 8,1,Playback(/tmp/test) ; "test message" After you enter extension 8, it jumps to here and does Playback. But it doesn't then jump back to s, it looks for 8,2, and, not finding it, it just waits for the default response timeout for another extension to be entered. But it is not WaitExten(10) that is doing that, it is default behaviour. If no extension is entered, it goes to t,1. > exten => #,1,Playback(goodbye) ; "Thanks for trying the demo" > exten => #,2,Hangup ; Hang them up. > exten => t,1,Goto(#,1) ; If they take too long, give up > exten => i,1,Playback(invalid) ; "That's not valid, try again" > > > Also, I'm confused about this line in the wiki regarding WaitExten. > Specifically what is mean't by 'stack' and 'restarts the current > context'. I'm guessing stack means the digits WaitExten has read from > the caller. I would think that restarting the current context would > mean it jump back up to s,1, but it doesn't. It just resumes at s,6. I agree the description is confusing! What I think it means is that the extension during the WaitExten period replaces the current extension (which was s), but in the current context (i.e. [whatever-its-in-already]). The term "stack" doesn't imply any kind of subroutine call-and-return functionality. Hope this helps Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
