On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:12:33 -0700, Kevin P. Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Miller wrote: > > > Mar 30 04:39:30 VERBOSE[32543]: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/sip.conf': > > Mar 30 04:39:30 VERBOSE[32543]: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/sip.conf': Found > > Mar 30 04:39:30 DEBUG[32543]: Unable to find key '203' in family > > 'SIP/Registry' > > Mar 30 04:39:30 VERBOSE[32543]: == SIP Listening on 0.0.0.0:5060 > > Mar 30 04:39:30 VERBOSE[32543]: == Using TOS bits 0 > > Mar 30 04:39:30 VERBOSE[32543]: == Registered channel type 'SIP' > > (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) > > > > Is the DEBUG message there significant? > > No, that's not significant. > > '401 Unauthorized' is a perfectly valid response from Asterisk, because > you have supplied a secret for that peer (203). What is supposed to > happen is that the SIP UAC (Linphone) sees the 401 response (with a > WWW-Authenticate header included) and retries the REGISTER with > authorization info included. > > However, here's something I hadn't noticed before: Asterisk is > _receiving_ its own '100 Trying' response! What are the IP addresses of > Asterisk and the softphone here? I suspect that .100 is the Asterisk > server, in which case the Contact header of the REGISTER request from > Linphone is completely wrong, since it should contain its own address.
They're both running on 192.168.1.100 Sorry -- I probably should've clarified that. I just tried installing asterisk on a different machine, with the same .conf files -- lo and behold, it works. Strange, but this will work. Thanks for your help. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
