> > > My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma > > > we're putting the dagger to Digium. > > > > If anything "puts the dagger" to Digium it'll be their own inability to > > engineer reliable hardware. > > > > I appreciate what Digium has done for Asterisk, but reliability expectations > > for phone equipment are extremely high. I sympathize with people who need > > hardware that doesn't need to be restarted once a week just to do its job > > properly. If Digium can't deliver on those reliability expectations, and do > > it soon, people are going to switch to companies that can. And you know > > what? I don't blame them. > > > The Digium boards need to be restarted once a week? > > Please clarify this. I was dead set on getting in a Sangoma A104 for a > production Asterisk box, but then I read this thread and felt that it > didn't matter so much what I would order... And so I was deciding to > stick with Digium. And then I read your scary comment. > > I've currently got a Digium board filled with 3 T1s, but it hasn't > been under heavy use right yet, due to my attention being pulled from > * and put onto SER+AudioCodes devices for other applications, and I > haven't had to restart yet. Is this going to change? What's the deal? > > Please clarify your statement for me, as I need reliability as well.
I'll jump in here (but I'm not the original poster). The "once a week" thing relates to the digium TDM card (fxo and/or fxs modules). I don't believe the T1 cards are an issue that requires driver reloads. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
