John Novack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruno Hertz wrote: > > <>Jean-Michel Hiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jean-Michel Hiver wrote: > Oops, sorry for the list reply :/ > > <>Actually, why does the Reply-To point to the Asterisk Users > mailing > list? This breaks the reply to sender only / reply to all / list > reply > functionality of my mailer. It's really broken :( > > Some would say your mail client is broken. What you're complaining about > is generally called 'reply-to munging', and there's been a long discussion > about this. Google reveals more, like these two oppositional opinions > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml > > Regards, Bruno. > > > And there probably will NEVER ba an agreement on this subject. > Another list I am on even went so far as to take a poll, and it was split > right > down the middle, half taking the correct position outlined in the first > article, and half the second, much less flexible, position.. > > The really curious thing on this list is every so often, if I choose to reply, > the poster AND the list appear, but mostly just the list, as if the poster had > some control as well.
Well, the reason for the latter apparently is that, in some postings to this list, there's actually two entries in the reply-to header, the posters mail and the list address, while in others it's only the list. Why this happens is above me, though, I thought it should be either/or. Regards, Bruno. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
