> >> > > > Postings to google are not mirrored here, tried it. I think we are going > > to start seeing many people new to * using the google group and not > > getting the benefit of the infinite wisdom here. > > > They will if google keeps getting the content from this list. The > problem would be that people on a google group say something that may > help people here and we dont see it. > > I have a problem with what happened last night in relation to the google > groups. Google sent out emails to a couple different lists I am on (and > an unknown quantity of lists I am not on) saying that the list is not > subscribed to google groups. This is blatent spam from a company I used > to respect and like. > > Googles refusal to fix the 302 redirect problem which has caused their > search results to be less accurate and now basically hijacking mailing > lists on a one sided basis is further cause for concern. By feeding the > content of lists into their database to get people to goto their webpage > and start threads there that are not shared with the list means its a > fork of the list and creates less info sharing. Its a good idea that > was poorly implemented. > > > > I can not imagine how you would sync them, that would only result in a > > circular posting nightmare. > > _______________________________ > > google could do it if they wanted. They obviously have a subscription > to the list or they wouldnt be able to get them. Well not obviously, > they could be going to gmane or other mail -> NNTP services that already > exist. > > If google did subscribe to the list to get content from the list, they > could easily post to the list as well. Although authentication may be > an issue if a list is 'closed' and google tries to insert the email > address supplied via their webpage. > > Regardless google could easily filter it so it only sends to the list > what is entered via a webpage and not everything it gets in its 'inbox'. > That would be an ideal solution so there is effectively not two > repositories of information, one on google and the list which would > effectively a subset of the information on their list. > > I do have some other issues with google groups, right after Sept 11, > 2001 google decided to delete many posts that were in their groups. > These were '911 propechy posts'. If they will delete for that reason, > and keep it silent that they did it as well as why, what would prevent > them from say not putting this post up because its not in googles best > interest? What would prevent them from putting up other posts that have > valid information in them just because google does not want people to be > able to see the information? > > But now I am just ranting and I have to fix the ram in this system so I > will leave this issue alone. > > -- > Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
Not to mention that the Google bounce servers are on every RBL in the world. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users