Matt Klein wrote:
Since encoding typically requires 5 times as much compute as decoding, for CELP based codecs, an encode onyl board would not be as dumb as it seems at first sight :-)Kevin, Mmm. Yep.
-m
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Matthew Boehm wrote:
So, no hardware encoding on this beast?
The announcement on the website makes no mention of transcoding, echo cancellation or toast-and-jam making, so at this time, no, there is no hardware transcoding apparently included. (Besides, would you really want a board that could only ENcode? <G>)
Regards, Steve
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
