That�s exactly what I thought but there are many parts on the wiki where they mention the "more than 1 SIP client behind NAT" mmyth..... Oh well, maybe an urban legend? :)
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling aka ManxPower Sent: Mi�rcoles, 20 de Abril de 2005 06:04 a.m. To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] NAT and only been able to have 1 SIP phone behind Anton Krall wrote: > Guys. > > Ive read on the wiki that a common problem with nat is that you can > only have 1 sip phone behind, how do you get around this issue? Having > a sip enabled router behind the nat like the GS 488 489 or 486? Or how > have you done it without having any kind of linux box (SER or *) behind the nat. > > The idea is to have 2 or more sip clients behind some NAT and been > able to connect to a remote asterisk box. I don't know why people think this. Any router with PAT (Port Address Translation) should work with multiple SIP clients behind NAT. Most routers support PAT (but may not call it that). _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
