Since this thread has been going on for awhile, I've forgotten whether anyone mentioned that at least some Sipura products shipped with a 10 millisecond rtp time. My spa3k was this way. I changed it to 20 milliseconds and reboot. Might just try that if the setting is avail to you.
------------------------ > We have basically the same setup. My cards are on 5 and 7 as well and I've > disabled EVERYTHING is the bios that is not necessary; USB, serial, > parallel, ect. I would think that if it was an IRQ issue, the call wouldn't > tank when I connected it on the card with it's own IRQ. I just got in my new > Cisco 7940 a few minutes ago and when I get a powersupply for it, I'm going > to remove the Sipura-841 and try this one out and see if maybe that doesn't > fix the problem. I'm doubtful, but it seems that this POS sipura is the only > thing that is REALLY differing from out configurations. I didn't install X > when I setup this box, so I know it's not running, but it's good to know > that it can cause problems. Thanks for the info, every bit helps. > > > Paul > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walt Reed > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 05:41 > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Line Noise UPDATE - If you've got line > noise,read this > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 02:40:10AM -0500, Paul said: > > > > Ok, well I managed to fix the IRQ conflicts...well, sorta. I have two > X100P > > cards in the system. One now has it's own interrupt and the other is > sharing > > one with the soundcard. I tested outbound calls on both cards, still have > > the damn static. I am so sick of this. Is anyone else using X100P cards > and > > NOT having this problem?? > > Yes. I can make a call from a POTS phone hooked up to a Cisco ATA 186, > out one X100P to the PSTN, back in a second X100P, to a phone hooked up > to the second port on the ATA186 with no noise, and no echo, and a > pretty small delay (which you can hear with one handset in each ear.) > > I have disabled most of the on-board I/O such as parallel, serial, and > extra USB controllers, and the X100's are on int 5 and 7, not shared > with anything. Interrupts 10 and 11 have a bunch of stuff shared and are > used by USB controllers, ethernet ports (one on each IRQ) video card, > SCSI controller, and one "unknown device" (some special nVidia device.) > > This machine is also used as a firewall / gateway / email server but > does NOT run X (which I hear can cause problems on some machines.) I've > been running this configuration for about 9 months with virtually no > problems in a SOHO environment including weekly 3-hour long conference > calls. > > I realize this doesn't help you much, but it IS possible for the > configuration to work. > > I have been thinking about getting a Sipura 3000 to add another FXS port > and remove one X100P which would also cut down on the number of > interrupts, leaving me one X100P for timming (so I don't need ztdummy.) > > MAYBE this would help you. > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ---------------End of Original Message----------------- _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
