On Apr 26, 2005, at 9:36 PM, Adam Goryachev wrote:
Just wondering, but does the AMD multi CPU architecture improve the
interrupt handling? My understanding of that architecture is that each
CPU can deal with "it's own" PCI bus/interrupts/etc independently of
each other, and also with their own memory/etc? Would this improve the
scalability? In fact, would a multi-PCI bus system by itself 'solve' the
problem?
I'd be interested in knowing this as well.
I'm not confident that the Asterisk software scales well under certain
conditions, such as using Monitor to digitally record 16 spans of voice
channels, so solving the card issue may not be the last step in a large
installation. If anyone has any insight on this, please post it to the
list.
Can't prove it, but by reading this: http://www.sineapps.com/news.php?rssid=653 it makes reference to a heavy loaded asterisk box doing a lot of "monitor"ing.
On a suitable system, I think the CPU involved in the transcoding from ulaw/alaw to slinear would be minimal. Converting from slinear to gsm for example, might be quite high, but if you record in ulaw/alaw, then this might work.
How do you specify how you want Monitor to save the audio. Sorry for my ignorance.
Thanks, Daniel
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
