Hows does this look? Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy...
8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8194 sample intervals 99.975586% 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% 8192 samples in 8193 sample intervals 99.987793% --- Results after 13 passes --- Best: 100.000000 -- Worst: 99.975586 -- Average: 99.987793 Good enough and what do I need to check in order to make 100%? What does the test actually measure? |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of |Kim Culhan |Sent: S�bado, 30 de Abril de 2005 08:45 a.m. |To: [email protected] |Subject: Re: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with TDM400P card | |On Fri, April 29, 2005 4:58 pm, GEOFFREY SACHS said: |> I would also be interested in alternatives to the Tdm400p. I |have had |> endless problems with a tdm400p card not being able to get |the zttest |> numbers above |> 99.975 and as a result not being able eliminate an |intermitent but consistent echo. |> I have tried to date 4 different motherboard and hardware |combinations |> as well as different linux versions to no avial.I would |welcome some feedback on this. | |Since there appear to be several combinations of hardware and |operating system which don't work well, here is a combination |which appears to work fairly well: | |Intel 925XCV mb | |P-4 560 (3.6 gHz) | |wcfxs0: <Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F> | |FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE | |zttest -v |Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... | |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% |8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% ^C |--- Results after 10 passes --- |Best: 100.000000 -- Worst: 100.000000 -- Average: 100.000000 | |hope this helps | |-kim | |-- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |_______________________________________________ |Asterisk-Users mailing list |[email protected] |http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users |To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users | | _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
