On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 16:40 -0400, David Brodbeck wrote: > I try to give machines here names that relate to their purpose, but ones > that aren't *too* software-specific, because renaming machines can be a > pain. (For example, I'm reluctant to give names like "asterisk" or "squid" > to machines, because what if I switch to some other package later?) I also > came in when some machine names had already been established, so I didn't > really have the option of using a cute, consistent scheme like some places > do. So, for example, we have a proxy server named "gatekeeper", firewalls > named "drawbridge" and "portcullis", and an AutoDesk Inventor Vault server
I named all my systems are 'medi-evil' and perhaps slightly more modern weapons, and related, originally I only had 32 IP addresses assigned, so I sat and worked out a list of names, now I have a little more than a class C, but I still haven't run out of my original 32 names :) I also try to use the name most appropriate to its function... Regards, Adam _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
