> >Steve, what would help a bunch of people trying to implement your > >spandsp is some kind of help document that at least attempts to > >describe some of the debug statements shown below. When the average > >person reads "hdlc underflow" or "T4 timeout in state 9", we don't > >have a clue what those statements really mean or even if they need > >to be addressed. I've probably spent at least 60 hours doing the > >same thing and finally gave up. > > > >If you really want to reduce your support overhead for spandsp, put > >something together that gives the implementor at least some clues > >how to read that stuff, and maybe even a clue how to resolve some > >of the more common issues. The foip.html appears to be a reasonable > >'background', but certainly not anything reaonable to resolve the > >OP debug output below. > > > > > Actually, that page explains why he is wasting his time. It wasn't > intended as background material. It was intended as the minimum needed > to get people off my back when they insist that if they use ulaw or alaw > FAXing over a VoIP channel must be OK. Its the only support for this > kind of issue they will get from me.
Wow, I didn't get it and I'd bet the OP didn't either. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
