Tim Pushor wrote:
Its obvious that Steve never looses, even when he's wrong, so arguing about it to him won't get anywhere.
I have been known to loose arguments. Not too many, but some. :-)
As for g729, I was pleasantly surprised by the quality.
I fully agree.
I may be old fashioned, but the purpose of my phone system is to communicate voice with other people, mostly in a business environment (low background noise). MY perception is that it works very well, much better than I had anticipated. In fact, it allowed me to drop a nice IP phone at one of my customers premises that have a less than stellar internet connection (ulaw was stutter city), with no outbound shaping.
I fully agree.
I don't care about what anyone else says, I am impressed with g729 and if it weren't for 1) the cost of transcoding and 2) the lack of g729 on FreeBSD I'd be using it more.
I fully agree.
Just my (humble) $0.02 CDN
Now tell me what relevance any of what you said has to the issue at hand. People come here looking for advice. How good is it? What are the pitfalls? Telling them G.729 is as good as G.711 is just plain stupid. They want a meaningful comparison - do I loose a little, or do I loose a lot?
Tim
Regards, Steve _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
